How Much Should We Trust Instrumental Variable Estimates in Political Science? Practical Advice based on Over 60 Replicated Studies

نویسندگان

چکیده

Instrumental variable (IV) strategies are commonly used in political science to establish causal relationships, yet the identifying assumptions required by an IV design demanding and it remains challenging for researchers evaluate their plausibility. We replicate 61 papers published three top journals from past decade (2011-2020) document several troubling patterns: (1) often miscalculate first-stage F statistics, overestimating strength of IVs; (2) most rely on classical asymptotic standard errors, which severely underestimate uncertainties around two-stage-least-squared (2SLS) estimates; (3) majority replicated studies, 2SLS estimates much bigger than ordinary-least-squared estimates, ratio is negatively correlated with IVs studies where not experimentally generated, suggesting potential violations exclusion restriction; such a relationship weaker generated IVs. To improve practice, we provide checklist avoid these pitfalls recommend zero-first-stage test local-to-zero procedure guard against failure assumptions.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-differences Estimates?*

Most papers that employ Differences-in-Differences estimation (DD) use many years of data and focus on serially correlated outcomes but ignore that the resulting standard errors are inconsistent. To illustrate the severity of this issue, we randomly generate placebo laws in state-level data on female wages from the Current Population Survey. For each law, we use OLS to compute the DD estimate o...

متن کامل

How Much Should We Trust

Most papers that employ Differences-in-Differences estimation (DD) use many years of data and focus on serially correlated outcomes but ignore that the resulting standard errors are inconsistent. To illustrate the severity of this issue, we randomly generate placebo laws in state-level data on female wages from the Current Population Survey. For each law, we use OLS to compute the DD estimate o...

متن کامل

How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-differences Estimates? Differencesin-differences Estimates? How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-differences Estimates?

Most Difference-in-Difference (DD) papers rely on many years of data and focus on serially correlated outcomes. Yet almost all these papers ignore the bias in the estimated standard errors that serial correlation introduces. This is especially troubling because the independent variable of interest in DD estimation (e.g. the passage of law) is itself very serially correlated, which will exacerba...

متن کامل

How Much Should We Trust Estimates from Multiplicative Interaction Models? Simple Tools to Improve Empirical Practice

Regressions with multiplicative interaction terms are widely used in the social sciences to test whether the relationship between an outcome and an independent variable changes depending on a moderator. Despite much advice on how to use interaction models, two important problems are currently overlooked in empirical practice. First, multiplicative interaction models are based on the crucial ass...

متن کامل

Genome scan methods against more complex models: when and how much should we trust them?

The recent availability of next-generation sequencing (NGS) has made possible the use of dense genetic markers to identify regions of the genome that may be under the influence of selection. Several statistical methods have been developed recently for this purpose. Here, we present the results of an individual-based simulation study investigating the power and error rate of popular or recent ge...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Social Science Research Network

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['1556-5068']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3905329